Andrei Alexandrescu, el 19 de junio a las 03:15 me escribiste: > On 06/18/2010 10:08 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: > >On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 05:22:47 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu > ><seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote: > > > >>Walter had no retort to that argument, so he veered into a critique of > >>the goto case XXX solution saying it's unmaintainable: when you moving > >>code around you want to keep on falling through but with goto you'd > >>need to update the goto target. However, it can be argued that > >>logically you want to continue processing at some specific logical > >>point, not to blindly fall through to whatever the heck code happens > >>to be there. > > > >Well, if "goto case XXX" is unmaintainable, how about some combination > >of existing keywords? For example, "continue switch;". > > > >-- Best regards, > >Vladimir mailto:vladi...@thecybershadow.net > > Clever!
Search the archives for the multiple fall-through threads. All have been suggested before. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/154.html#N388 -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Gloria Carrá, Gloria Estephan, Gloria Gaynor y Gloria Trevi. -- Peperino Pómoro