Adam Ruppe wrote:
To abandon DMD for that is language suicide.
Well, one reason (certainly not the only one) I keep with the current dmd back end is that I don't need to spend time convincing some other organization to fix/improve/customize it for better D support. I can just get it done.
Being in control of the toolchain has a lot of benefits.For example, look at gdb, and trying to get it to support D - not for the patches themselves, but getting them accepted into the standard gdb.
