On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:27:37 -0400, Jesse Phillips
<jessekphillip...@gmail.com> wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
I wouldn't mind the current docs, but I'd like to have some document to
know what tags are defined and what they mean (like a ddocdoc), and how
to
define new tags. Maybe this already exists?
My two comments are, shouldn't paragraphs be handled with a blank line?
And yes there is a document on ddoc
http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/ddoc.html
Thanks, I hadn't seen that page (looks like there's a missing parentheses
in there too! ;)
I'll have to see if I can get vim to read ddoc properly so I can edit it
fine the next time.
I agree 100%, get rid of all the $(P's. I'd rather see natural text. I'm
a big fan of trac's wiki format, where formatting is pretty natural. i.e.
a bulleted list looks like this:
* item 1
* item 2
You still need tags for things like bold or italic, but those should be
few and far between. And of course, you need macros for dynamic content
generation.
-Steve
