On 2/09/10 7:34 AM, Pelle wrote:
It needs opEquals :-)
Yeah, it needs a lot of things :)
You could easily add unary operators as well (e.g. so that -amb([1, 2])
== [-1, -2]. I didn't bother adding more than I did because it would
make the post too large, and wouldn't really add anything (I thought
that the binary ops + dispatch covered most of the interesting cases).
Also, I think it would supposed to return amb(map!...) instead of just
returning map!... (otherwise you couldn't chain them), but that's a
simple fix.
