== Quote from Nick Sabalausky (a...@a.a)'s article > Interesting thing, but devil's advocate: What would be the uses/benefits of > that versus just having "for each element" versions of the operators?
Well the obvious benefit is that you don't have to create all those extra version -- you get them all for free. > Also, "ambiguous" seems like a rather odd name for what it does. I don't see > how ambiguity has anything to do with it. That disconnect made it difficult > at first for me to understand what it was. It's more like an "elementwise" > or something. I agree, it's a pretty bad name. I'd call it "all" or something.