It appears that in XML parsing Java is actually 5..10 times faster than
D1/Phobos. Maybe D2/Phobos has finally fixed these issues.
RapidXML is a 2.5k loc header file, using templates.
Equal D code possibly using ranges and slicing wouldn't be more than 1k
loc, and it would still be possible to outperform it since C++ don't have
any of these and much more.
I would love to see a comparison of C++ and D implementation of this
lib/header.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
