On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:17:42 +0400, so <s...@so.do> wrote:
It appears that in XML parsing Java is actually 5..10 times faster than
D1/Phobos. Maybe D2/Phobos has finally fixed these issues.
RapidXML is a 2.5k loc header file, using templates.
Equal D code possibly using ranges and slicing wouldn't be more than 1k
loc, and it would still be possible to outperform it since C++ don't
have any of these and much more.
I would love to see a comparison of C++ and D implementation of this
lib/header.
Tango (D1) XML module performance comparison:
http://dotnot.org/blog/archives/2008/02/
