On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:31:26 -0400, Tomek Sowiński <j...@ask.me> wrote:
Initializing immutable structures is a source of constant grief. Anything non-trivial requires instancing a mutable structure, initializing it, and then either casting to immutable (it's up to you to ensure no alias leaked) or, not to violate the type system, duplicate the whole.
Aren't we supposed to get so-called immutable constructors? If that's not what you mean, can you give an example of such grief? I admit I don't use immutable structs/objects in day-to-day coding. -Steve
