so Wrote: > At initialization rvalue should not contain anything about > lvalue, this is absurd.
That may well be the case.
I was only pointing out that as far as the Microsoft
compiler is concerned, saying the code:
'compiles with no warning, no error, nothing...'
is incorrect. It will issue a warning even if the default
warning level of 1 is used.
Now as to question whether or not this is a smart way
to handle the situation, that is a totally different
discussion all together;)
