On 01/11/2010 22:58, Diego Cano Lagneaux wrote:
In most Europe, Engineering is always a 5 years (masters) degree,
oriented to big project developers who'll (supposedly) lead teams. I've
heard it's different in the Anglosaxon systems.

Whoa! :o
Shit, I'm going to go on a big tangent here, but I'm very surprised to
again hear that notion that the 5 year CS/Engineering degrees in
Europe are for "big project developers who'll (supposedly) lead teams.".
In my university (which, btw, is widely regarded as the best
technical/engineering school in Portugal), that idea was often
mentioned by some of the "senior" students in my degree. The details
of their opinions varied, but generally some of them seemed to think
that our graduates would soon become project managers and/or software
architects in the workforce, whereas most of the programming and grunt
work would be left to the "trolhas": the lowly developers who took the
subprime 3 year "practical" courses in other
universities/polytechnics. ("Trolha" is Portuguese slang for a
bricklayer, or also any guy who does construction work... see the
metaphor here?)

Obviously I found this whole idea to be complete nonsense. Not that I
didn't agree that the CS/E graduates from our degree were much better
(on average) than the graduates from those 3 or 4 year CS/E courses,
but rather the stupid notion that it would be perfectly fine (and
ideal) for a software team to have one or two good software engineers
as project leaders/managers/architects, and the rest to be "code
monkeys"... These seniors students were completely blind to the
importance of having the majority of your developers be good, smart
developers (even if junior ones).
One or two of such seniors even went so far as to comment that
programming itself was a lowly task, for "trolhas" only... we the
Engineers might program in the first 2-3 years after entering the
workplace, but we would gradually move to a architure/design role in
enterprise and soon would not need program anymore... [end of quote,
and you could feel in these comments how much this guy really disliked
programming... ]
Man, my eyes went cartoonishly wide open when I read this. How
incredibly deluded this guy was... :S

But the whole surprising thing is, I wasn't expecting this kind of
attitude in other countries, I thought this was somewhat isolated in
Portugal... a mix of personal delusion (derived from the fact that
actually these guys sucked at programming, or anything else useful),
combined with a still lingering non-meritocratic class arrogance in
Portuguese society. Nobility may be long gone, but there are a lot of
people in Portugal who like to put themselves about other people, and
having a degree (especially with title-conferring degrees, which
engineering degrees are btw) is a very common excuse for people trying
to make themselves look superior, (even if their degree was crappy, or
they sucked at it).



Well, I am not sure you got what I meant. What I said is not that
engineers will never code or won't have to after a couple years. The
idea is more that engineers will be able to have people with different
skills to manage, or to work closely with, so they'll have to know many
fields to understand the whole thing. And I was not talking specifically
about computers, but about all kinds of engineering. Engineering is
about understanding and developping projects as a whole, which doesn't
exclude working also on the details.
Of course, many engineers may end doing different things, which is
another advantage of the generalist approach. I'm actually doing
websites now!

Yeah, I wasn't accusing you of sharing that viewpoint, at least not in the same way that those students I mentioned in my post.

But you do agree that in the case of Software Engineers at least, you will lead a big project only after you have several years of experience (more or less depending on how big the project is), and even so, only if you are skilled enough? But more importantly, you don't need to lead over anyone to be a Software Engineer, even a good one.
In other words, it's not very analogous to say, civil engineering.


--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer

Reply via email to