Steven Schveighoffer Wrote: > I think 100-nsecs is a good choice for tick resolution.
My concern is millisecond is a SI unit, but hectonanosecond isn't, so I don't think, it's a good choice: it's hardly comprehensible. > It gives a very generous range for working > with, plus is fine-grained enough to deal with many years of speed > increases in processors. Clock and stopwatch have different usages. I think, it's no problem to design stopwatch with tunable precision (as a template parameter).
