On 02/11/11 18:46, so wrote: >> atob(1, 6) // easy to mix things like atoi >> ptoq(1, 6) // rocks imo! > > walk(1, 6) // now you have admit this is the best.
I dunno. When I see 'walk' I think of collections, not ranges. But... I don't think it'd be terribly ambiguous, at least. For the record... I "get" the iota name... and I don't buy the eye-ambiguity with itoa. We should be using to!string, yes? But I'd be happy to see a more descriptive name, so keep at it. -- Chris N-S