On 2/12/11 3:59 AM, Christopher Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
On 02/11/11 18:46, so wrote:
atob(1, 6) // easy to mix things like atoi
ptoq(1, 6) // rocks imo!
walk(1, 6) // now you have admit this is the best.
I dunno. When I see 'walk' I think of collections, not ranges. But...
I don't think it'd be terribly ambiguous, at least.
For the record... I "get" the iota name... and I don't buy the
eye-ambiguity with itoa. We should be using to!string, yes? But I'd be
happy to see a more descriptive name, so keep at it.
-- Chris N-S
Look how iota fans are coming out of the woodwork! :o)
Andrei
