"Nick Sabalausky" <a@a.a> wrote in message news:il3tra$3gg$1...@digitalmars.com... > "Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> wrote in message > news:mailman.2328.1299539399.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com... >> On Monday, March 07, 2011 12:43:00 Nick Sabalausky wrote: >>> "Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> wrote in message >>> news:mailman.2297.1299478837.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com... >>> >>> > On Sunday 06 March 2011 21:57:30 Nick Sabalausky wrote: >>> >>> Yea, that's what I figured, and that's why I was strongly in favor of >>> assertPred despite the "promise" of assert improvements. >>> >>> You're the sole author of assertPred, right? Do you mind if I include it >>> in >>> my zlib/libpng-licensed SemiTwist D Tools library ( >>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/semitwist ) ? I already have an >>> assert-alternative in there, but assertPred is vastly superior. >>> (Although, >>> my assert-alternative does save a list of failures instead of >>> immediately >>> throwing, which I personally find to be essential for unittests, so I >>> would >>> probably add the *optional* ability to have assertPred do the same.) >> >> Yes. I'm the sole author. Feel free to re-use it. It's under Boost, so >> you can >> use it for whatever Boost lets you do with it, and even if what you're >> doing >> isn't Boost compatible, it's fine with me if you use it anyway. >> > > Thanks. >
I've added it and made an optional 'autoThrow' flag that, if set to false, prevents a failure from immediately bailing out of the whole unittest (some people like that, like me, and others don't). http://www.dsource.org/projects/semitwist/changeset?new=%2F%40196&old=%2F%40193