On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> wrote: >> Lars T. Kyllingstad: >> > Please vote in this thread, by replying with >> > >> > - "YES" if you think std.parallelism should be included in Phobos >> > >> > in its present form, >> > >> > - "NO" if you think it shouldn't. >> >> If my vote counts then Yes. > > Everyone's vote on the newsgroup counts unless it becomes evident that we have > a sock puppet problem or a ton of people that never post here start voting or > some other problem occurs where it's evident that there's a problem which is > skewing the votes. As long as things continue to go smoothly with the voting > and people don't abuse it, anyone on the newsgroup can vote. > > - Jonathan M Davis >
I would like to make a comment if that's okay. If a person is not an expert on parallelism, library development, or we can't verify his or her background and such, I don't see why their vote should count. I'm not voting because I'm just an ordinary D user, and I have no expertise in parallelism. And since this a public vote, if would be great if people who are voting did not hide behind an alias, such as bearophile. P.S. I can't wait for std.parallelism to become part of Phobos.