On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 13:41 -0400, dsimcha wrote: [ . . . ] > The review process leading up to the voting was not, however, a joke or > unanimous or anything similar. I received plenty of tough-but-fair > criticism and it led to substantial improvements in the library and > especially the documentation.
Which is perhaps why the review process itself is incredibly valuable but the vote process is a bit fatuous as a decision making system. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@russel.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
