== Quote from Michel Fortin (michel.for...@michelf.com)'s article > I say yes. > I want to mention that I am a left a little skeptical about the lack of > low-level race safety in this module, but I understand that this is > more a language- or compiler-level problem than one with the module > itself. I hope these problem will be addressed eventually and that > std.parallelism can become safe that day.
I **hope** so, too. I'm just more skeptical than you that it can be done, even in principle, without major sacrifices in terms of efficiency, expressiveness or flexibility.
