== Quote from Michel Fortin (michel.for...@michelf.com)'s article > I say yes. > I want to mention that I am a left a little skeptical about the lack of > low-level race safety in this module, but I understand that this is > more a language- or compiler-level problem than one with the module > itself. I hope these problem will be addressed eventually and that > std.parallelism can become safe that day.
One other point about safety: D's flagship concurrency model doesn't hold your hand on high-level invariants, only low-level data races. Probably nothing will ever be able to hold your hand about high level invariants. With std.parallelism getting the high-level invariants (i.e. what has data dependencies and what doesn't) wrong can lead to low-level races, but as long as you get the high-level invariants right (only parallelize stuff without data dependencies) all the low level concurrency issues are taken care of and there can be no low-level data races.
