On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 16:40 -0400, dsimcha wrote: [ . . . ] > I consider it a no-brainer to include just the bindings and SQLite C > code in etc right now. SQLite is arguably the most widely used > database, is easy to distribute and is public domain. It would be great > if this infrastructure was "just there" for whoever wants to build on it. > > As far as the wrapper, I would love a simple SQLite wrapper in Phobos, > since SQLite is the only DB I personally care about. However, it seems > others in the community are interested in a more general SQL DB wrapper > that can be used with a variety of backends. Now that no GSoC database > project has been accepted, we need to consider other options for getting > this done. I understand that there are a lot of independent attempts, > but I don't know the status of them or which ones, if any, are targeting > eventual inclusion in Phobos.
Is a strong argument that Python has SQLite bindings as standard and is stronger because of it? -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@russel.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
