Ary Manzana wrote: > Why you need a type tuple? Can't you do: > > foreach(np; [1, 2, 3, 5, 10])
That is a runtime foreach, so no. If the argument is a TypeTuple, the compiler evaluates the foreach as a "static foreach", effectively duplicating all code in its body and filling in the constants/types in the tuple. I would like an explicit "static foreach" better though. Timon
