On 5/31/11, eles <[email protected]> wrote: > Nice picture, but then why foo[1] is rather 8 than 4? And what is foo > [9]?
foo[9] is out of range. If foo[1] was actually referring to 4, then foo[0] would be out of range too. I've only used this picture because back years ago when I was trying to understand how this whole system works there was an explanation similar to this one in some book, the name of which I forgot. But it did 'click' with me when I saw it presented like that.
