Andrei: > Currently the best proposed behavior is to only require control flow if > there is actual code before it. So adjacent case labels don't require > any. Your example code would work unmodified.
We have already discussed a little about this. The basic rule is to require a control flow statement at the end of each case. The special case you refer to is when there are empty case labels. I agree this special case is not going to cause bugs. In general I hate special cases, but now I have changed my mind and I now agree this one is acceptable. I hope to see such small change to D switches in a short enough time, reducing code breakage too :-) Thank you for improving D, bearophile
