Trass3r wrote: > Am 10.06.2011, 13:48 Uhr, schrieb Robert Clipsham > <rob...@octarineparrot.com>: >> You're probably better off for it - I used to be strongly in the >> mercurial camp, but having used git for a while I find I vastly prefer >> it, despite still not knowing how to do quite a bit with it. > > Yep, Mercurial's biggest drawback imo is that bookmarks (which let you > do something analogous to git's branches) aren't standard and thus > aren't pushed/pulled by default.
Bookmarks are local by definition. If you want the same
functionality that can be pushed/pulled, you should use branches. Or
did I miss something?
Jerome
--
mailto:jeber...@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
