"bearophile" <bearophileh...@lycos.com> wrote in message news:ivcg7j$ooj$1...@digitalmars.com... > Jacob Carlborg reminds that 1.f conflicts with the UFCS, I think the > suggestion by Daniel Murphy of the special case is not worth it. >
If the only reason for removing 1.f and 1.L is to aid ufcs we should also get rid of leading underscores after the decimal point. eg 1._3 also conflicts with ufcs. And don't forget hex floating point literals.