Caligo: > while we are at it, let's get rid of this too: > > class _{ } > > why would anyone want to name a class or a variable _ ??
I use _ now and then in debugging as variable name when I don't care for the name itself (but this is not a very good practice otherwise). While in the years "incomplete" floating point literals have caused me some small troubles, a _ class/struct/union name has caused me none of them, so I suggest to not change this. Bye, bearophile