== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmx.com)'s article > std.file.copy is synchronous. Would the suggestion then be to change it to be > asynchronous or to create a second function (e.g. copyAsync) which does an > asynchrous copy? > - Jonathan M Davis
Probably just make it asynchronous because I can't figure out why anyone would want a synchronous file copy and we don't want to make the API gargantuan and confusing. At any rate, fixing std.file.copy isn't a high priority because I don't imagine it's a performance bottleneck nearly as often as most other Phobos I/O.
