On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:53:09 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
<andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/6/11, Andrei Alexandrescu <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
Or should we, au contraire, use "old_" for the
old module and advise people who want to stick with the old modules to
change their imports?
I would say that's the right way to go. It's much easier to change an
import than change code. Perhaps another alternative is to use version
statements. DFL uses it for deprecated features that are still in the
codebase and usable.
I agree. I'd hate for the current std.xml to squat that name forever...
In a related story, why did digitalmars.com change D to mean D2 instead of
just using new_D? :)
Also new coke.
-Steve
