On 22-10-2011 17:18, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:35:57 +0300, Alex Rønne Petersen
<xtzgzo...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 22-10-2011 15:20, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/22/11, Vladimir Panteleev<vladi...@thecybershadow.net> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:50:32 +0300, Alex Rønne Petersen
<xtzgzo...@gmail.com> wrote:
You could just introduce a -reflection switch to include reflection
information.
As I mentioned in the previous thread on the subject, I think that
ideally
we should improve compile-time reflection so it's possible to generate
runtime reflection information at compilation time. Something like
this:
import reflection;
enum reflectionForStdStdio = generateReflectionForModule("std.stdio");
void main()
{
reflectionForStdStdio.callFunction("writeln", "Hello, world!");
}
--
Best regards,
Vladimir mailto:vladi...@thecybershadow.net
I think user properties would be a perfect fit for this. :)
@reflected
struct Foo {}
The only downside with either approach
What do you mean by "either approach"? Which is the other one?
@reflected and generateReflectionForModule.
- Alex
