Chante Wrote: > >> So you're saying the code you write as FOSS should cost something > >> (i.e. > >> you want something in return)? Interesting... > > > > It's just two paradigms: if you choose freedom, GPL ensures and > > protects the freedom. You can also provide your efforts to > > corporations - why not? - proprietary licenses and patents are > > *adequate* means to do it. > > Surely you meant "communism" rather than "freedom", otherwise the above > is non-sensical.
See? Corporations and people like you don't buy freedom. Software for money is what you understand best.
