On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 15:30 -0500, Chante wrote: > "Kagamin" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... > > Steven Schveighoffer Wrote: > > > >> So you're saying the code you write as FOSS should cost something > >> (i.e. > >> you want something in return)? Interesting... > > > > It's just two paradigms: if you choose freedom, GPL ensures and > > protects the freedom. You can also provide your efforts to > > corporations - why not? - proprietary licenses and patents are > > *adequate* means to do it. > > Surely you meant "communism" rather than "freedom", otherwise the above > is non-sensical.
Surely "communism" is sharing without constraint. That means GPL is not "communist" whereas Boost is? -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
