On 03-11-2011 18:45, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:24:53 +0100, Danni Coy <danni....@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Martin Nowak <d...@dawgfoto.de> wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 11:07:54 +0100, Denis Shelomovskij <
verylonglogin....@gmail.com> wrote:
Two regular arguments against git.
- The Tcl/Tk based Git Gui and gitk look awful.
Yes the do but are highly efficient on a day-to-day basis.
I'm running a FreeBSD system and I can not find any simple
(non-KDE) but complete Hg tool.
Complete here means committing and inspecting the tree.
On windows you have TortoiseHg which already is too fancy.\
It's a pity you specify non-kde. However so far I have found git-cola my
favourite git front end and KDevelops built in git support is starting to
get good. Git Cola I think is Qt but with no KDE dependencies.
We are about to trial git-cola and git on our windows workstations for
our
artists (they are currently using subversion and tortoise-svn - but
have a
lot of slowdowns due to our artists committing assets but forgetting to
commit other assets that those assets refer to).
I don't have issues finding a program for git but one for hg.
Looks nice though, especially the DAG reminds me of an idea
I have in mind which I never got round to program.
Setting-up Git on Windows can be a mildly PITA, so I wish you good luck.
There's a commercial tool http://www.syntevo.com/smartgit/index.html
that some people like but IMHO it's too Java.
martin
msysgit has always worked great on Windows for me.
- Alex
