-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/28/2011 02:56 AM, so wrote: > I think you believe something i would say quite naive, as everyone > have the best intentions, as they just fight for what they believe > right. Maybe it was the case where we were in caves, it is not > now. I'm sorry, I can't tell if you meant that I would believe your idea naive, or if you believe that my idea is naive.
Either way its probably true. =P I would tend to believe that the cavemen were a little more pure in their intentions. (assuming that they were 'retarded' compared to man now. Can someone be blamed for not thinking of others when it is harder for them to actually think?) But we are different from cavemen and animals, they act more on instinct. > > Everything boils down to one thing IMO, we live in a structure made > of with the worst of the intentions. We accumulate power to a > single place and every now and then give it to a mad puppet. (never > been a decent man had that power, why would a decent man want that > kind of power?) On that we agree. But I wouldn't say never. There have been decent people in a position of power. But they are entirely too few. > They are doing what they were told, destroying everything in their > way, and we have to live with its consequences because we are that > stupid. Doing what you are told and refusing to acknowledge that your orders might be wrong is just another form of what I was talking about. "If I question my orders, I risk losing something of value. Therefore, my wellbeing trumps other people's wellbeing." The opinion ends up being that he believes that he is more important than others. > They are smart people, far smarter than the mess. They are not > racist but they profit from racism. It is not the clash of > opinions, it never was, it is just the clash of profit. Profit, opinions, they are both just variations on a theme. "If I do this, I stand to gain wealth. Me having wealth is greater than you having life." It all boils down to the belief that they are more important, and/or 'right.' "Because I can profit, this is justifiable." == "Because my god said so, this is justifiable." > It was the clash of opinions for dummies like us who just go and > die for them. Not sure I understand, but I think I agree. =P I don't think the english language really has a word for what I'm trying to describe. kind of a combination of selfishness, and judgement. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO01qBAAoJENcHIWLyQiSlONAH/06UTGdH4zBrO7BgiBOGARF/ kkP+8l+l3z37LYvpPUXkSHlsRcQDX2/TXslKhiB4oQCjLEvoCIhrBa0TqeU0KZia pzWoKW+AhpJNSP8Uag40m46Lx3aiABY0krdRzBSHx00l/Bc0Qx3d9SOmwROVK2R4 tManuIH3a2gjRRJ6F8uHvzdpGBD6a23iD1dCEUIvWlNCbZtI5dMmAcHxhuu2ssdv S8SCEIkGct6EHXUXOuz1X8FEIrwtsHCayN5/o5UHFibIZnuvU3Q1rhdOaJRLpMW4 SD9Ck/IvGp7Pg/CN8+a14z/7at+Lm4vzmp2bFcYVcJUjZ6pQ4ISxE6x0G3Siero= =+yfh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----