Timon Gehr wrote: > It is confusing to people who don't know the language. It is a simple > construct. In my experience, it is certainly not error prone. If you are > aware that such an operator exists.
It may not be error prone to write, but it is error prone to read, because the comma-operator tends to hide in the language noise produced by all those brackets, semicolons, commas, parenthesis and curly braces. I don't like it, if I have to be uber careful when reading trivial code.
