On Sunday, 11 December 2011 at 21:22:37 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-12-10 22:17, jdrewsen wrote:
On Saturday, 10 December 2011 at 08:55:57 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I think I've come so far in my development of a package manager that
it's time to think how it should interact with the compiler.

Currently I see two use cases:

1. When the package manager installs (and builds) a package

2. When a user (developer) builds a project and want's to use
installed packages

In the best of worlds the user wouldn't have to do anything and it just works. The package manger needs to somehow pass import paths to
the compiler and libraries to link with.

I'm not entirely sure what the best method to do this would be. But I'm thinking that if the compiler could accept compiler flags passed via environment variables use case 1 would be easy to implement.

For use case 2 it would be a bit more problematic. In this use case the user would need to somehow tell the package manager that I want to
use these packages, something like:

// project.obspec
orb "foo"
orb "bar"

$ orb use project.obspec

or for single packages

$ orb use foobar
$ dmd project.d

If environment variables are used in this case, then the package manager would need a shell script wrapper, the same way as DVM does it, to be able to set environment variables for the parent (the shell). The reason for this is that a child process (the package manager) can't set environment variables for the parent process (the shell). This complicates the implementation and installation of the package manager and requires different implementations for Posix and
Windows.

Another idea would be to manipulate the dmd.conf/sc.ini file but that seems to be quite complicated and messy. On the other hand, this
wouldn't require any changes to the compiler.

Any other ideas?

https://github.com/jacob-carlborg/orbit/wiki/Orbit-Package-Manager-for-D
https://github.com/jacob-carlborg/orbit

For use case 1 the package manager could just as well call dmd directly with the correct flags ie. no need for using environment variables.

I was thinking that the package manager just invokes a build tool like make, rdmd, dsss, shell script and so on.

Use case 2 does not belong to a package manager in my opinion. It is the job of a build tool to configure packages for a project. What would be nice to have support for using packages without a build tool. Maybe something
like what pkg-config provides:

dmd -ofhello `orb -lib foo` hello.d where "org -lib foo" returns the
flags to use the foo package.

/Jonas

I would say that the preferred way is to use a build tool then there is no problem. The build tool just asks the package manager which import paths to use for the given packages and pass the information to the compiler. But I don't want my package manager to depend on a built tool, I want it to be usable on its own.

And for that I think the pkg-config method is the way to go. Setting environment vars brings unneeded state into you development session. Another option would be to just wrap dmd in a e.g. orbdmd command and handle it there.

Btw: have you considered renaming from orb to something that makes sense to newbies e.g. dpack?

-Jonas


Reply via email to