On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 15:49:34 Timon Gehr wrote: > 2. Dynamic binding is a core concept of OOP. A language that does not > support dynamic binding does not support OOP. A program that does not > use dynamic binding is not object oriented. What is to disagree with?
I don't agree with that either. You don't need polymorphism for OOP. It's quite restricted without it, but you can still program with objects even if you're restricted to something like D's structs, so you're still doing OOP. - Jonathan M Davis
