On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 20:11:41 +0200, Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:

On 12/27/2011 7:11 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Imagine how bitter I am that the string lambda syntax didn't catch on!

As I told Andrei last night, I think it was a great experiment. Sure, it failed, but it was a great idea, technically sound, and the fact that it worked is a testament to D's power.

If we're not willing to try things like that, we've failed in a much grander sense.

So I have no regrets at all about that.

If C++ or Java (or what have you) had support for string as template parameters,
string lambdas probably would be irreplaceable to many.

|"a % 2"|
|a => a % 2|

Still it is shorter.

Reply via email to