On 1/13/12 2:41 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/13/2012 12:27 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:On 13/01/12 8:02 PM, Mehrdad wrote:Er... is there any reason why we're using such a cryptic PXOR value instead of operator overloading?I imagine Walter will add the operator overloads later.Right. simd() is just the bottom layer building block. It's a compiler intrinsic, and I don't want to make every overload a compiler intrinsic.
People will want to pass a variable for op. Would that work? Andrei