On 14 January 2012 00:31, Andrei Alexandrescu <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org > wrote:
> On 1/13/12 2:41 PM, Walter Bright wrote: > >> On 1/13/2012 12:27 PM, Peter Alexander wrote: >> >>> On 13/01/12 8:02 PM, Mehrdad wrote: >>> >>>> Er... is there any reason why we're using such a cryptic PXOR value >>>> instead of operator overloading? >>>> >>> >>> I imagine Walter will add the operator overloads later. >>> >> >> Right. simd() is just the bottom layer building block. It's a compiler >> intrinsic, and I don't want to make every overload a compiler intrinsic. >> > > People will want to pass a variable for op. Would that work? ...I really don't think they will. and most people would never dive this deep if the standard lib does its job properly.
