Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 January 2012 at 18:01:48 UTC, Zachary Lund wrote:
I do not mind using a C library in D because of how straight forward
it is. But simply mentioning C++ in D seems to add unneeded complexity
which should be avoided. I think the answer to a question such as
"What's the alternative to Qt in D?" should not be "Qt bindings" but
maybe a library which imitates the implementation and/or interface of
Qt UI widgets in native D.
http://www.ohloh.net/p/qt/estimated_cost
some scary numbers
$300K for build scripts... and Mozilla paid almost 3 million for the same.
