On 1/26/12, bls <bizp...@orange.fr> wrote: > Hi Andrej, > first of all : it is NOT my intention to pick on your nerves. > I am just curious and , ahem, a bit impatience. > > Have you made some progress on the code generator ? > Are you running into problems, hard to solve problems ? > > Well, it would be nice to get some feedback. I am really keen to see the > code. (cause I'll try,based on your code, to create bindings to the > wxShapeFramework... ) > Kind regards, > Bjoern (bls) > PS Have you noticed the wxPHP update. > PPS Wouldn't make more sense to use the new Tango 2 'cause it has XPath > support ? Given XPath support is imited, but I think good enough for this > task.
I'm working on this around the clock. If everything goes ok I might have the wxc wrapper done by the end of the week, but I'm not making any promises. I'm not having much difficulty, there are some edge-cases here and there but it's fine. PS: Yes, however I'm now basing the wxc generated code around the existing wxc binding, and not wxPhp. wxPhp uses some 3rd party library that has to do a lot of magic to interact with a C library, so it's code generators are not that useful to me. The existing wxc bindings already have memory management in place which I can reuse. PPS: I'm parsing the xml files fine, there's no need to use tango at this point. I'm not publishing any code yet since I don't want people to do duplicate work and make pulls, we'll end up stepping on each other's toes. And work can't be done in parallel since you need wxc before you can generate wxd wrappers. I'd ask for a little bit of patience! Thanks. :)