Re: automated C++ binding generation.. Booost D, NO , Not us. SIMD is more important.

[Kagamin]

On Monday, 6 February 2012 at 11:25:09 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:

To be taken with a pinch of salt. I raised an eyebrow or two when

looking at the estimated cost for GDC. ;-)

A C++ to D autoporter? That's an interesting idea.