On Thursday, February 02, 2012 18:11:34 Jesse Phillips wrote: > On Thursday, 2 February 2012 at 04:39:11 UTC, dsimcha wrote: > > Wait a minute, since when do we even have a std.xml2? I've > > never heard of it and it's not in the Phobos source tree (I > > just checked). > > As others point out it is xmlp, I've been using it for the last > year or two, and recently seen an improvement on performance (as > mentioned). I don't know how comparable it is, and Richard seems > to see a slow down from GC, for me disabling the GC during load > doesn't change load time, but I'm not using the document loader. > > I hope Michael will put some effort into getting it ready for > review. But still, people should use it and get him some > incentive to do the work.
In theory, Tomek SowiĆski was working on a replacement for std.xml which was the likely replacement for std.xml, but he seems to have disappeared... His last post was on an XML writer back in June. So, I don't know what the current situation with that is. - Jonathan M Davis