On Thursday, February 02, 2012 20:06:14 Manu wrote: > On 2 February 2012 17:40, dsimcha <dsim...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, 2 February 2012 at 04:38:49 UTC, Robert Jacques wrote: > >> An XML parser would probably want some kind of stack segment growth > >> schedule, which, IIRC isn't supported by RegionAllocator. > > > > at least assuming we're targeting PCs and not embedded devices. > > I don't know about the implications of your decision, but comment makes me > feel uneasy. > > I don't know how you can possibly make that assumption? Have you looked > around at the devices people actually use these days? > PC's are an endangered and dying species... I couldn't imagine a worse > assumption if it influences the application of D on different systems.
PCs are not endangered in the least. It's just that we're getting an increase in other devices (particularly smart phones and tablets). PCs are _heavily_ used, and there's no way that smart phones or tablets could replace them. They do different stuff. It _is_ true that applications are increasingly being written for non-PCs, but PCs definitely aren't dying off. Also, how much do you really treat smart phones or tablets like embedded devices rather than PCs? They're certainly more like PCs than the embedded devices of yore. True, they have stricter performance requirements, but they're nowhere near as restrictive as they used to be. - Jonathan M Davis