"Alex Rønne Petersen" <xtzgzo...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:jjg7dq$24q$1...@digitalmars.com... > On 10-03-2012 18:58, H. S. Teoh wrote: >> >> Then you must be running a very different Linux from the one I use. In >> my experience, it's Windows that's an order of magnitude less responsive >> due to constant HD thrashing (esp. on bootup, and then periodically >> thereafter) and too much eye-candy. > > This. On the other hand, OS X has all the eye candy and is still extremely > responsive. ;) >
That's because they cram [their] hardware upgrades down your throat every couple years.
