On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 06:39:07 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Chris NS" <ibisbase...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ugopmohijjcnnrchu...@forum.dlang.org...
I'm pretty impressed with the idea, and look forward to its
implementation, but I do have one question. How does this
affect (if at all) the implicit "friend" relationship of
declarations? Since package "foo.bar" is treated as a single
module, do the classes in "foo/bar/alpha.d" and
"foo/bar/beta.d" have access to each other's private members?
I'm not sure whether I favor them losing or keeping their
"friend" status.
There's always the "package" access specifier.
True, though it bears revisiting in its own right. I've never
been completely satisfied with the horizontal visibility, and
would have preferred 'package' be defined as "visible within
current package, *and subpackages* of the current." But now I'm
getting a bit off-topic.
