On 4/6/2012 12:31 AM, Bernard Helyer wrote:
I like it. Perhaps@attr(bar) could be equivalent to @attr(bar = true) so you don't get any weird failure state for __traits(getAttribute?
That's what the hasAttribute is for.
On 4/6/2012 12:31 AM, Bernard Helyer wrote:
I like it. Perhaps@attr(bar) could be equivalent to @attr(bar = true) so you don't get any weird failure state for __traits(getAttribute?
That's what the hasAttribute is for.