On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:21:19PM +0200, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote: > On 29-04-2012 00:49, H. S. Teoh wrote: > >On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:39:03AM +0200, Timon Gehr wrote: [...] > >>- 'in' operator returning a pointer to the element. > > > >Yeah that one elicited a WAT from me when I first started using it. > >Surprisingly enough, it sounded OK when I read it in TDPL, but when I > >started using it I realized just how b0rken it is. [...] > > How so? It's seemed entirely reasonable to me. [...]
I was expecting it to return bool. It also precludes bool-valued AA's from being implemented using bit arrays, since you can't return a pointer to a bit. T -- In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.