On 05/01/2012 01:30 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 5/1/12, Timon Gehr<timon.g...@gmx.ch> wrote:
On 05/01/2012 12:53 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 5/1/12, Timon Gehr<timon.g...@gmx.ch> wrote:
D2 -> D3 will be full of breaking changes anyway.
Uhmm I hope not,
Then what is the point of D3?
An incremental improvement with as little code breakage as possible?
IMHO that is similar to aiming for some code breakage with as little
improvement as possible. Retainment of backwards-compatibility is what
makes languages convoluted. Furthermore, the translation from D2->D3
should be possible to be performed automatically.
You can't even properly mix D1 and D2 code in the same library right now
without resorting to using mixin() tricks.
This means you actually can!
