On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:32:52PM +0200, Era Scarecrow wrote: [[...] > If anything, I would consider D3 an ideal, something to work > towards. And no it wouldn't be started or really worked on for at > 10-15 years after D's mature and at Andrei's goal of having at least > a million users. And as stated before, if there [b]IS[/b] going to > be a D3 at any point it should have no problem calling D2 code.
Do we know (roughly) how many D users are out there right now? > Course thinking of D3 now is kinda like thinking of flying cars and > how you want a flying car and you won't buy a car today until it can > fly... Back (in the 50-60's was it?) they thought we would be > having a flying car for every family and had these really badly done > animations of what they expected to see. I don't see any flying cars > outside of Hollywood. Best if we stick in the present and deal with > our problems now. There aren't any flying cars in Hollywood either. They're either just artist's concepts (*cough*CGI models*cough*), held up by strings, or just superimposed on an animated background. T -- It is not the employer who pays the wages. Employers only handle the money. It is the customer who pays the wages. -- Henry Ford