On 18-05-2012 11:07, Norbert Nemec wrote:
In my experience, TortoiseGIT is rather awkward to use. Anyone looking
for a GUI for git should have a look at SmartGIT. It is commercial but
zero cost for non-commercial use, available for Win/Mac/Linux and I
don't know any other GUI that comes even close in quality.
I hadn't even heard of that one until reading this thread. Will
definitely have a look at that.
I guess there will always be some expert operations that require using
the git CLI. This is just as usable on Windows as it is on Unix, but
Windows users tend to avoid CLI in general. Anyhow, a user who migrates
from SVN to GIT would not even miss that kind of operations.
Unfortunately, they'd be missing out on all the cool Git features then. ;)
In general I don't see any aspect where GIT is less adapted to Windows
than any other version control.
On 18.05.2012 09:58, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
I remember back when we were considering whether to move DMD, Phobos and
druntime from SVN on DSource to Git on GitHub, there were some concerns
about using Git on Windows. People claimed that Git was a very
Linux-centric tool, and that Windows support was buggy at best.
Still, we made the switch, and I haven't really registered that many
complaints since. So now I'm curious: Windows users, have you just
resigned, or did Git actually turn out to work well on Windows?
Specifically, is it usable from the CMD command line, and are graphical
front-ends such as TortoiseGit any good? (I know running it through
Cygwin works well, but that doesn't count.)
-Lars
--
Alex Rønne Petersen
a...@lycus.org
http://lycus.org
